Thomas Brandenburg
Author - Thomas Brandenburg

Interview with Luka Baranović, Director of Customer Experience at Croatian Telecom. Article by Thomas Brandenburg.

“The idea is to go deeper along design path and start discussing service contexts, meanings, relationships. affordances, signifiers and other dimensions of design. Eventually to come to the level of design (and discussion) similar as in other branches (e.g. industrial design, architecture, etc.). I strongly believe we are still very shallow in our discussion, and that we need to push deeper.” — Luka Baranović

Luka Baranović
Luka Baranović

Why do you think there has not been a shared definition of service design? Do you think it is important to have one, especially for an in-house discipline?
"Service design is currently widely used and interpreted in many ways. With time, certain segments of interaction design established themselves on the business landscape. But in reality service design has 3 main directions of evolution: (i) service design related to setting up new service within current business scope or transformation (e.g. DIGITAL would be included in here),  (ii) innovation where we are exploring new boundaries and changing the business landscape by stepping into the unknown and (iii) launching improvements in existing business. This is a large area to cover and requires different skill set in each of them, but underlying focus should remain the same with focus on customers.  

What language (keywords or phrases) do you like to use to explain service design to an audience who is not familiar with it?
"The two that are most useful in that context are: Emotions & Behavior. Having a story how certain event triggers emotions that impact customer’s behavior (and company’s cost) is always a door opener. But my goal is to go further than that. The idea is to go deeper along design path and start discussing service contexts, meanings, relationships. affordances, signifiers and other dimensions of design. Eventually to come to the level of design (and discussion) similar as in other branches (e.g. industrial design, architecture, etc.). I strongly believe we are still very shallow in our discussion, and that we need to push deeper."

Service design is often interchanged with systems design, user experience or design thinking, do you think it is an issue?
"I understand there is a lot of discussion around definitions and boundaries of service design. But when you are part of the internal service design team working within the company, you are working on all levels.We have to raise above those discussions and start addressing real customer and business challenges.

The method that you will use to solve the challenge is up to you and your creativity or skills (sometimes a UX change is sufficient, but sometimes full scale system design change is needed). I believe it is the time that we stop limiting ourselves with tools that we use, and profile ourselves towards being problem solvers."

Are there any overused or misused terms that may be robbing service design of credibility?
"Lots of them to be honest. However, the lack of understanding for the depth a designer was required to go to solve the challenge, is the most critical. Design is not tangible, neither can be measured in physical measurements. However, a part of the design process must be the business impact, and the measurement of impact must be clear from the beginning. Many of practitioner jump to design process without thinking on business impact – and that is when you get robbed.  

How might you see the language of service design being changed or evolving for people in business, especially since they traditionally don’t have a design background?
"I believe that we will meet half way, to be honest. Business people will (never) be designers, no matter how much we want them to be. We must make service design approachable to them. One thing that is good to start with is that business people have a tendency to take and use what’s familiar (or useful) to them.

So to begin, we must start naming the service elements and the content we design. The same way architects, designers, musicians etc. are naming their creations. This will definitely put service within their discussion. If the business impact is kept in sight, the interest will be there, and qualities of design will start emerge soon, healthy design discussion will ignite. If we remain sitting in our corner, expecting business world to understand, trust me – nothing will happen.

Do you have any last thoughts you would like to share with our readers on new language of service design?
"Service design world must evolve. Currently if you create an overview of all service design discussions, soon you will realize that they are revolving around tools (e.g. how to create customer journey map, how to run service blueprint workshop effectively, etc.).

This is useful for entry level of service designers and business people trying to penetrate the service design world. But we must have language to describe what we actually design and how it performs in real life. This is “the language” that we as a service design community miss and definitely need to focus on in the future."

Check out other conversations at https://5by5.blog/

Related Community Knowledge

Meet the service designer Meet the service designer: Natalie Kuhn (she/her)

Meet the service designer: Natalie Kuhn (she/her)

Along with fellow service design pioneers in the New York City area, Natalie Kuhn helped establish the SDN New York Chapter. In the years since, her team and chapter have been recognised with awards for their chapter activities, and she has been involved with the global SDN's efforts around Diversity, Equity and Inclusion, as part of a taskforce established in 2020. She also manages to find time for her day job: Managing service design at US banking giant Capital One. Here, she chats with Touchpoint Editor-in-Chief Jesse Grimes about her roles and ambitions.

Continue reading
Meet the service designer Patti Hunt:  Meet the service designer

Patti Hunt: Meet the service designer

Patti Hunt is the founder and director of MAKE Studios, a service innovation company based in Hong Kong. For this edition of the Touchpoint Profile, she had a chat with Jesse Grimes, the journal’s Editor-in-Chief, about her work with multi-national corporations, NGOs and start-ups in the Asia-Pacific region, as well as the unique challenges posed by practicing service design in Hong Kong.

Continue reading
Meet the service designer Eleonora Carnasa: Meet the service designer

Eleonora Carnasa: Meet the service designer

Eleonora Carnasa is a Bulgaria-based service designer and founder of Fabrica 360, a design and innovation agency. In this profile, she had a chat with Jesse Grimes, Touchpoint’s Editor-in-Chief, about her efforts to grow service design in Eastern Europe.

Continue reading
Meet the service designer Luis Alt: Meet the service designer

Luis Alt: Meet the service designer

Established in 2010, Livework’s São Paulo outpost is a service design pioneer in one of the world’s top-ten largest economies - Brazil. Since then, the team has worked with an enviable roster of clients, but also experienced the challenges of carrying out service design before it became widely recognised. In this edition of the Touchpoint Profile, Editor-in-Chief Jesse Grimes speaks to Luis Alt, one of the studio’s founders.

Continue reading