Your Friend Service Design by Shad Gross

As with any new and exciting discipline, there arise some questions of identity— what the discipline is, what territory it occupies, and what expectations should and should not be laid upon it.

If you would ask ten people what service design is, you would end up with eleven different answers— at least.

While service design has been growing in terms of its influence, it still remains a relatively new discipline. As with any new and exciting discipline, there arise some questions of identity— what the discipline is, what territory it occupies, and what expectations should and should not be laid upon it. As Pierce and Stickdorn explain in the foundational This is Service Design Thinking: “If you would ask ten people what service design is, you would end up with eleven different answers— at least.” This article compares service design with some of its siblings: product design, consumer experience and UX.

I caught up with Natalie Schneider, Christopher Vice and Youngbok Hong (co-founders of the Indianapolis chapter of the Service Design Network) to get their take on the nuances between service design and the adjacent disciplines: product design, user experience design and consumer experience. This is what I discovered.

Service Design and (Industrial) Product Design

Product design at its core is a process of creating physical objects for people to consume— think of a toaster, chair, or a car. Consideration is given to the aesthetics of these objects as well as how they function. In contrast, Service Design focuses on a service experience, not necessarily on an object or product. Today, service is the new battleground for competitive differentiation, with an increasing percentage of our GDP being directed towards services. To put it another way, if what separates one business from another is the experience of their service, then those companies should ensure that those experiences are orchestrated by design and not by chance.

Christopher Vice describes services as “transactions (exchange of payment for a product, assistance, or advice) or actions (performance of a task or utilization of a resource)” and service design as “the intentional creation and improvement of the processes that establish how these transactions and actions happen.” Christopher adds that “service design aligns the operational systems (people, places, information, things) needed to deliver the service with the needs of the people using it.” 

To put this into perspective, let’s consider someone catching a taxi. A product design perspective might focus on the specifics of the car - the ergonomics of the seats, the number of people it can hold, or even the painting scheme to help it be identifiable compared to other cars. Compare this to an experience such as Uber where these matters are concerns and differentiators between tiers of service, but they also come together with other elements to create a more whole service experience. This includes actions of passenger contacting the ride, waiting, and the feelings of the rider during and after the ride as well as the transaction of payment. Careful attention to these Service Design concerns has led Uber to disrupt the taxi industry.

Service Design (SD) and User Experience (UX) Design

UX and SD are frequently confused, and for good reason. They both share a profound appreciation for a human centered approach to design, and therefore both use common human-centered, qualitative research methods such as interviews and contextual inquiry in order to focus designs on the people who will use them. The primary distinction that separates UX from SD, is UX has its roots in the field of Human-Computer Interaction, and aims to create software and hardware interfaces that are both usable and useful to people. Alternately, Service Design may incorporate any number of interfaces, but also weaves them in with other elements that make up a service.

Alternately, Service Design pursues an open–ended, value–driven process, not imposing a predefined solution in initiating a design process. Youngbok Hong shares her perspective that service design is “a methodical approach that defines the values of a design solution— desirability, feasibility and viability- from a system point of view.” Taking her work as an example, Hong describes: “My recent work has been heavily involved in healthcare research and service. Although Patient-Centered Care or Patient-Centered Outcomes Research has been emphasized in the healthcare sector, a methodical approach to implement those value statements in practice has not been fully developed yet. In that sense, my service design approach has provided comprehensive and effective methods to bring patients’ perspectives and experiences into the healthcare system, thus connecting and leveraging health care practices for improving patient experience.” 

This system point of view shares in many of the concerns of UX— whether people will want a service, whether it is possible to create that service, and how that service fits into a business but expands upon the interface to include a greater ecosystem of people, settings and objects that must work in harmony to create a good experience. The product of service design is frequently a map or blueprint of such an ecosystem. A mobile or web interface (which is the primary output of UX) becomes one of many touchpoints in service design, and may be featured in a journey map or other such design artifact.

Returning to the taxi analogy, from a UX perspective, focus might be placed on a means to call a taxi from the web or even a car interface to guide the driver to the passenger’s destination. Both have concerns about how someone might use such a service, where to put different buttons and how to tailor the interfaces to avoid frustration or, in the case of car navigation, situations that could lead to harmful accidents. Uber brings these elements together in harmony, connecting the car’s guidance system to the passenger’s request application and closing the loop with feedback after the ride. However, as with Service Design and Product Design, these are just a couple of touchpoints in a greater Service Design ecosystem.

Service Design and Customer Experience (CX) Design

Customer (or Consumer) Experience Design and Service Design are very close, and many professionals sit at the intersection of these two disciplines. Their difference lies in scale and depth, with CX covering a broader range of concerns while Service Design digs a little deeper into a narrower set of concerns.

Natalie Schneider describes the relationship in terms of a ‘T’. Consumer experience crosses the top bar of a ‘T’ and incorporates five components: (1) measurement; (2) consumer culture; (3) consumer strategy; (4) design of consumer experiences and (5) governance (with governance covering investments, portfolio management and oversight). While consumer experience is broad, service design runs deep. It runs down the vertical of ‘design’ and is focused on delivering consumer experiences based on design research – those experiences could be digital (and incorporate UX) but they don’t have to be. In a nutshell, CX and SD share the same end goal of driving out consumer pain points and improving customer satisfaction, but from a different ‘altitude’.

Of all of the comparisons, the lines are the blurriest between CX and Service Design. Even from the perspective of the taxi analogy that has clarified the previous examples, it is unclear how to differentiate between the two. This may be a feature rather than a problem, however, as the concerns of both ladder up to a positive customer experience.


The take-away here is that all these adjacent disciplines intersect— as do the people that passionately engage in them every day, which is why the Indianapolis chapter of the Service Design Network has been established: to bring this community of people-centered designers together, to connect, mentor, learn— and make things happen! 

Please join us at our inaugural event on Wednesday, October 18 at 6pm. Additional details are on the Indianapolis chapter page of the SDN website.

The Indianapolis chapter of Service Design Network aims to create a cohesive community of service design professionals and students that are collectively committed to advancing the practice of service design.

Shad Gross is a Consumer Experience research scientist at Anthem. His work has ranged from teaching aspects of Service Design as part of his doctoral work at Indiana University, producing service design artifacts for a number of different companies, and consulting on web, television, and film projects as a freelancer.

Related Headlines

SDN Chapters Call for Papers: Touchpoint Vol. 13 No. 3

Call for Papers: Touchpoint Vol. 13 No. 3

The Call for Papers for our next issue of Touchpoint is open! Submit your abstract by October 16th 2022 and help us to advance the service design field and its practices. We’re looking forward to many inspiring contributions!

Continue reading
SDN Chapters Register today! In-person conference tickets almost sold out!

Register today! In-person conference tickets almost sold out!

There is still time to register for the Service Design Global Conference 2022 which will take place in Copenhagen, October 13 - 14, 2022.

Continue reading
SDN Chapters We are Service Works  Receives  Organisational Accreditation

We are Service Works Receives Organisational Accreditation

We are Service Works is granted with SDN Organisational Accreditation

Continue reading
SDN Global News SDA Organisational Re-Accreditation

SDA Organisational Re-Accreditation

SDN is delighted to announce the Service Design Network Organisational Re-Accreditation of Service Design Academy (SDA) from 2022 – to 2025.

Continue reading